Resources Roundup: Warm Up Inspiration for Statsketball 2020

Statsketball is back for its fourth year, with two unique challenges to put your statistics skills to the test in predicting the NCAA Basketball Tournament champions. Whether you’re a player yourself or have never set foot on a basketball court, with statistics you could make winning predictions.

Leading up to the March 15 and March 16 Selection Shows, when submissions for the contest open, these resources can help you figure out your strategy.

Some Upset Insight

If you’re going for the “Pick ‘Em”: Upset Challenge, this refresher on how to pick March Madness upsets will prove useful. NCAA examined the last 35 tournaments and crunched the numbers to figure out how many upset picks are likely. They found the annual average to be 12.2.

Read through their breakdowns on upsets to understand the data behind your choices.

It’s Not Always About the Score

The first thing many look at when picking brackets are scores. After all, scoring wins games. But an element of the game that often gets overlooked is passing.

ESPN explains why it’s beneficial to look at assist percentages when picking your bracket. Over the past decade, the average Final Four team had assists on 21.1 percent of its buckets.

As a team sport, it shouldn’t be a surprise that winning teams work together and pass the ball. Study some of the data on assists to help fill out your bracket on Selection Sunday.

There’s Math Behind the Madness

Sorry to burst your bubble, but the probability of picking a perfect bracket is almost nonexistent. You have a 1 in 9.2 quintillion chance of winning if you pick randomly, but with some statistics your odds can be a lot better.

This article in Smithsonian Magazine explains the benefit of weighing the teams’ rankings on variables beyond regular season records. It recommends incorporating factors including the level of difficulty of the opponent, the number of points each game was won or lost by, and when they were played. Think about what variables to consider as you pick your brackets—these can help you get closer to a win!

Unexpected Contenders in the Men’s Tournament

The men’s tournament biggest contenders are looking a little different than usual this year. Schools that aren’t regularly ranked as top teams—Baylor, San Diego State, Dayton and Maryland—are among expert rankings. Even more, there’s a general weakness amongst the top teams. Kansas is at its weakest statistical efficiency rating going into an NCAA Tournament since 2002.

So what does this mean for your bracket? FiveThirtyEight looks at looks at the unusual contenders, noting these factors could add even more madness to the March games. Perhaps an unknown team will become a favorite, or a low seed will make the Final Four. Either way, it’s going to be a wild ride!

Don’t forget to have fun with challenge, it’s all a game! Dust off your stats sneakers and get ready for Statsketball 2020.

Ready to Get on the Court? Submissions Open March 15

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Related Posts

Fall Data Challenge 2020: Congratulations to our Winners!

In this year’s Fall Data Challenge, Get Out the Vote, 56 teams of 66 high school and 61 undergraduate students submitted their recommendations on how to increase voter-turnout using voting behavior data from the Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics, provided by the IPUMS organization.   Students recommended a variety of impressive voter-turnout strategies to implement for future elections. Overwhelmingly, their statistical assessment of the dataset led them to a correlation between increased education and increased voter…

Video: How Statistics is Making an Impact in Mental Health

Statistics improves our lives—including our mental health! In our newest This is Statistics video, learn how data from research and trials can lead to insights that not only improve our understanding of mental health, but also make it more personalized to individuals’ unique needs. This video features Samprit Banerjee, Ph.D., M. Stat. Associate Professor of Biostatistics,…

Comments are closed.